Part 4 people of the series "Controlling ur point and shoot cam " , where u learn to understand how ur cam "thinks" .
Video from www.youtube.com/user/DigitalPhotoGuy
A place to share the knowledge and experience, others and I gain on our photographic journey .
Part 4 people of the series "Controlling ur point and shoot cam " , where u learn to understand how ur cam "thinks" .
Video from www.youtube.com/user/DigitalPhotoGuy
Posted by
Semary
at
1:48 AM
9
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
1:36 AM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
1:02 AM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
1:00 AM
0
comments
Long ago in post 4 of underwater photography , i was planning on posting this article , yet i decided it was wiser if i explained the underwater cam system first , and we did that in parts 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , and now were here . Just to remind u guys of what we discussed under the topic of underwater shots :
1) Basic problems & solutions
2) A vid demonstrating the use of a wide angle lens and a red filter underwater
3) Hints for the innocent
4) Underwater housing systems
5) Housings in more detail
6) Ports
7) A video of the whole system put together

Posted by
Semary
at
12:53 AM
0
comments
What i love about mr David Hobby ( creator of one of the most famous photo blogs of all time, STROBIST ) , is his increadible ability to use any environment for his best benefit . He is extremely adaptable , and creates awesome quality work , with minimal equipment . He really understands light , and can virtually create a studio environment out of any place . Today i copy paste this teaser paragraph from his blog and its basically about using on location shade (from buildings for example) to achieve a better exposure for ur shots :
" One of the first things to consider when balancing strobe and ambient light is whether or not you can knock the ambient down a bit, to give you more options with your small-flash lighting ratios.
Posted by
Semary
at
11:39 AM
0
comments

Posted by
Semary
at
7:04 PM
0
comments
Guys this technique is extremely easy but will give u some amazing results with good impact , i personally LOVE IT . Its called cross lighting , and its basically just using flash to light ur frame in a direction opposite the sun . Or u can say balancing sun and flash . Strobist explained this in 3 full posts , technical details on how to balance included MUST READ.. Remember our reverse engineering post , if u reverse engineer these shots u'll find there are only 2 light sources , daylight , and a single flash .


Posted by
Semary
at
11:02 PM
1 comments
For those of u who are following along , ud know we have an ongoing series called THINGS U SHOULD KNOW discussing topics like copyright and licensing ... Those of u who just joined , or who werent paying attention we discussed :
1) Copyright
2) Licensing
3) Royalty free
4) Third party distribution rights
Today we discuss : Shooting on spec ...
What's wrong with shooting on spec?
Shooting on "spec" (or speculative) means to shoot to a client's specifications without the guaranteed payment of an assignment. It can be a tempting opportunity, especially when first starting out, that comes from speaking with an Art Director who mentions, for instance, that they have a story coming up in your area. While they don't have money for an assignment, continues the AD, they'll be looking for photos of X, Y, and Z and they'd like to see your stuff. Often, the AD will mention that these shots will probably be great stock shots for you to have anyway in an attempt to convince you to go shoot them. If this is true, and the images really are good, generic, saleable stock images, then by all means, go build your stock library and submit some images. But be careful. Do not let the client dictate what it is they are looking for to the extent that the images become too specific to be of any future value. For instance, a recent "stock" request mentioned, "There's a great overlook of the James River about 3-4 miles from the Balcony Falls Trailhead. A road does follow the River in some spots, but there's one bend that the road veers more north, making it possible to have a nice wilderness-like photo. " This sounds pretty specific and more like directions that should be given in an assignment. After all, when else will you ever have the chance to license an image from 3-4 miles down the Balcony Falls Trail, overlooking the James River, showing only a wilderness view, not the road that also follows the river?
The problems with shooting on spec are many. First, you're the only one guaranteed to be laying out money for expenses like film and processing, travel, road meals, packaging, and FedEx, not to mention the time involved to travel, hike, shoot, return, visit the lab, sort, label, package, and re-file the returned images. You're by no means guaranteed to make the sale and if you think that they're going to just sit around and wait on you to submit stuff, you're wrong. If they wanted that, they'd give out an assignment. They'll also be calling other eager shooters and probably combing stock libraries as well, so the chances of yours being the only images they'll see are slim at best.
Second, even if you do make the sale, you must first cover all of your own expenses, leaving little money left to pay for your time. In contrast, if hired for an assignment, your client should pick up the expenses of the trip, the film and processing costs, and then pay you a fee on top of that. Many a spec shooter has made a sale, only to discover that it ended up costing them money, just for the privilege of being published. Flattering, but not a very smart way to try to stay in business. Remember, we should never be so desperate or so vain to simply get published that we forget that the goal of getting published is to make a living.
Finally, shooting on spec erodes the number of assignments available by once again proving to an AD that there will always be a photographer more desperate to get published than to make a living.
As tempting as spec shooting may sound, no opportunity is free. As businesspeople, we must always weigh the benefit of an opportunity compared to all of its costs, tangible and intangible, current and future, and only then can we decide if this is a good deal for us at this time. For instance, the potential benefits of shooting on spec are: POSSIBLE publication; POSSIBLE income of a few hundred dollars; POSSIBLY beginning a relationship with a new client; and finally building stock that has only POSSIBLE future value. The costs are: DEFINITE commitment of time for travel, shooting, sorting, packaging, and filing; DEFINITE costs for film and processing; DEFINITE costs for gas and a day's travel; DEFINITE costs for packaging and shipping; and DEFINITE erosion of available future assignments. It seems that if you were to take this on, you would be the only one with DEFINITE commitments, while your potential client remains just that -- a POTENTIAL client -- and assumes none of the risk. This doesn't seem like a win-win situation or a smart business decision.
Article from http://www.editorialphoto.com/resources/faq.asp#anchor14
Posted by
Semary
at
10:19 AM
10
comments
YAS YAS YAS..!! Its here ..... THE TALENT SPOT ......



Posted by
Semary
at
7:47 PM
49
comments
Ok today were wrapping up the underwater cam system , after talking about housings , and ports , today were discussing strobes , mechanical arms , and a small video so u can see what the system looks like when its put together . :) Lets g0 ------->


Posted by
Semary
at
6:19 PM
0
comments


for the reduction in angle of coverage caused by the air-water boundary. A dome port is set-up for wide-angle photography by placing the entrance pupil of the lens at the centre of curvature of the dome (ie., the point at the middle if the dome were a complete sphere). In this case, light rays heading for the entrance pupil always strike the port surface at right-angles, no refraction occurs, and the angle of coverage of the main lens is conserved. This convenient situation comes at a price however, which is that the port acts as a strong de-magnifying lens.
Posted by
Semary
at
6:18 PM
0
comments
As promised in part 4 of underwater photography, we said we'll discuss how the underwater cam system works in more detail . So today were gonna talk about housings .
simply contract (reduce in volume) to keep the pressure on the inside and the outside the same. This is a very reliable system, because the lack of any pressure difference means that there is no real tendency for the housing to leak. This system is also very simple, because the controls of the equipment inside the housing can mostly be operated through the flexible plastic. There are limitations to this approach however, because as you go deeper, there will come a point when the housing clings tightly to whatever is inside it, the housing won't be able to shrink anymore, and a pressure difference will begin to appear. Consequently, flexible housings still need to have a pressure-resistant sealing system. The ewa-marine housings in the pictures above all use a metal clamp, held together by hand-tightening screw-fasteners ('hand-wheel nuts'). Closing the housing is a matter of making sure that the two surfaces which will be clamped together are clean, since dirt, and particularly hairs, can make microscopic channels through which the water can creep. Cleaning the surfaces is simply a matter of wiping them with a lint-free cloth or paper towel, and inspecting them carefully before fitting the clamp. When assembled properly, the sealing system, and the tough flexible plastic material, can withstand large pressures, 30 or 40 metres of water, and the real limitation is that of how much punishment the thing inside the housing can take. With cameras, there comes a point when the water starts to press buttons which you don't want pressed, and so the recommended depth limit for flexible housings is usually (but not always) about 10 metres.
gets tighter as the pressure increases; which means that the seal is inherently reliable, provided that the O-ring and the O-ring groove are kept in good condition and are kept thoroughly clean while the housing is being closed. This is the most important thing you need to know about underwater photography with hard housings, because bad husbandry in this department can lead to serious disappointment, whereas bad photographic technique can be rectified with practice. There is nothing difficult about assembling an O-ring seal however; it is simply a matter of cleaning the O-ring and the groove with a paper towel,
inspecting the surfaces for dirt and hairs, and, for the type of seal shown above, applying a very thin coating of grease to the O-ring. The grease used on O-rings incidentally, does not form part of the seal; its job is simply to make the O-ring slippery so that it can slide into position without being damaged. Most manufacturers opt for the hard-housing approach to underwater equipment design, and a wide range of underwater cameras, camera housings, camcorder housings, and torches are available, with depth ratings from 20 metres to over 100 metres.
Posted by
Semary
at
4:05 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
8:36 PM
0
comments
Still on the underwater topic ! I was planning to make part 4 about cam maintenance ( quick reminder we discussed "probs and solutions" in part (1) , posted a vid about using a wide angle lens and a red filter in part (2) , and talked about the "reality check" in part (3) ), then i thought to my self , lets explain how the underwater cam system works , just so that u guys know what ure maintaining . So lets get to it ! .. Oh and one more thing , the part about explaining how the system works is probably gonna be explained over a bunch of more posts .



Posted by
Semary
at
10:21 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
12:28 AM
67
comments
Continuing parts (1) , (2) , (3) , where we discussed copyrights , licensing , and royalty free , today we discuss third party distribution rights .
What are "third party" distribution rights and why should I care?
By law, the right to control and profit from the distribution of images lies with the copyright holder. Many clients' contracts will attempt to claim that right for the client, as in, " the right to reproduce, distribute, adapt or display [the image]", or the right to, " transferorsublicense [the image]". By allowing this language to stay in a contract, you are effectively agreeing to allow the client to re-sell your images, perhaps even in direct competition with you, and keep the fee!These contracts ridiculously attempt to claim that because the client has licensed the use of the image once, or even paid for its original creation, that the client then has the right to continue to profit from the image in the future. This is in direct conflict with both the intent and the letter of US Copyright Law and should be stricken from every contract.
The only time a clause like this should be allowed to stand is when you are intentionally allowing a third party to act as your agent, on your behalf, and when there is a specific agreement spelled out for the sharing of both responsibilities and revenues. A typical assignment, and especially stock sale, has no business including a rights-grabbing clause demanding third party rights. To protect help yourself, be sure that you include language to the effect, "No third party rights are granted and this agreement may not be assigned, transferred, or sold, in whole or in part. By granting this license, photographer in no way relinquishes, assigns, transfers, or sells his/her copyright," on everyestimate, contract, usage license, and/or invoice as appropriate.
Article fom : Editorial Photo
Posted by
Semary
at
5:39 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
12:05 PM
0
comments
Posted by
Semary
at
8:28 PM
0
comments